# Transparent, Data-Driven & Verified Rankings
Ranking Methodology & Evaluation Framework
Ranking Philosophy
Our ranking framework evaluates institutions across academics, governance, outcomes, and social impact. The methodology ensures comparability, fairness, and verifiable results across regions and categories.
Primary Data Sources
- Institution-submitted audited data
- Government & accreditation portals
- Placement and outcome disclosures
- Public domain verification
Verification Process
- Multi-stage document validation
- Data consistency & anomaly checks
- Cross-verification with public records
- Final approval by ranking committee
Important: Rankings reflect data quality and transparency.
False or misleading submissions may lead to disqualification.
Evaluation Pillars
Academic Excellence
30%
Faculty & Research
20%
Placements & Outcomes
20%
Infrastructure
15%
Governance & Transparency
15%